Tables: K-League Standings 2011 to 2015
With the season starting on Saturday, I feel like this is a good time to post this. If you are interested in seeing how your team has fared from 2011 until 2015, here are the tables. I really hope I got my math right this time.
2011 K-League Table
Team
|
P
|
Wins
|
Draws
|
Losses
|
GF (avg.)
|
GA (avg.)
|
Pts.
|
Avg Pts.
|
Jeonbuk
|
30
|
18 (60%)
|
9 (30%)
|
3 (10%)
|
67 (2.23)
|
32 (1.07)
|
63 (70%)
|
2.1
|
Pohang
|
30
|
17 (56.66%)
|
8 (26.66%)
|
5 (16.66%)
|
59 (1.97)
|
33 (1.10)
|
59 (66%)
|
1.97
|
FC Seoul
|
30
|
16 (53.33%)
|
7 (23.33%)
|
7 (23.33%)
|
56 (1.87)
|
38 (1.26)
|
55 (61%)
|
1.83
|
(w/Choi Yong-soo)
|
23
|
15 (65.21%)
|
4 (17.39%)
|
4 (17.39%)
|
50 (2.17)
|
28 (1.22)
|
49 (71%)
|
2.13
|
Suwon Samsung
|
30
|
17 (57%)
|
4 (13%)
|
9 (30%)
|
51 (1.70)
|
33 (1.10)
|
55 (61%)
|
1.83
|
Busan I Park
|
30
|
13 (43.33%)
|
7 (23.33%)
|
10 (33.33%)
|
49 (1.63)
|
43 (1.43)
|
46 (51%)
|
1.53
|
Ulsan Hyundai
|
30
|
13 (43.33%)
|
7 (23.33%)
|
10 (33.33%)
|
33 (1.10)
|
29 (0.97)
|
46 (51%)
|
1.53
|
Jeonnam
|
30
|
11 (37%)
|
10 (33%)
|
9 (30%)
|
33 (1.10)
|
29 (0.97)
|
43 (48%)
|
1.43
|
Gyeongnam FC
|
30
|
12 (40%)
|
6 (20%)
|
12 (40%)
|
41 (1.37)
|
40 (1.33)
|
42 (47%)
|
1.4
|
Jeju United
|
30
|
10 (33.33%)
|
10 (33.33%)
|
10 (33.33%)
|
44 (1.47)
|
45 (1.50)
|
40 (44%)
|
1.33
|
Seongnam
|
30
|
9 (30%)
|
8 (27%)
|
13 (43%)
|
43 (1.43)
|
47 (1.57)
|
35 (39%)
|
1.17
|
Gwangju FC
|
30
|
9 (30%)
|
8 (27%)
|
13 (43%)
|
32 (1.07)
|
43 (1.43)
|
35 (39%)
|
1.17
|
Daegu FC
|
30
|
8 (27%)
|
9 (30%)
|
13 (43%)
|
35 (1.17)
|
46 (1.53)
|
33 (37%)
|
1.1
|
Incheon United
|
30
|
6 (20%)
|
14 (47%)
|
10 (33%)
|
31 (1.03)
|
40 (1.33)
|
32 (36%)
|
1.07
|
Sangju Sangmu
|
30
|
7 (23%)
|
8 (27%)
|
15 (50%)
|
36 (1.20)
|
53 (1.77)
|
29 (32%)
|
0.97
|
Daejeon Citizen
|
30
|
6 (20%)
|
9 (30%)
|
15 (50%)
|
31 (1.03)
|
59 (1.97)
|
27 (30%)
|
0.9
|
Gangwon FC
|
30
|
3 (10%)
|
6 (20%)
|
21 (70%)
|
14 (0.47)
|
45 (1.50)
|
15 (17%)
|
0.5
|
Other than 2013, the tightest rate at the top. One team averaged more than two points, one was pretty much at two points, and the third and fourth teams were pretty damn close.
2012 K-League Classic Table
Team
|
P
|
Wins
|
Draws
|
Losses
|
GF (avg.)
|
GA (avg.)
|
Pts.
|
Avg Pts.
|
FC Seoul
|
44
|
29 (66%)
|
9 (20%)
|
6 (14%)
|
76 (1.73)
|
42 (0.95)
|
96 (73%)
|
2.18
|
Jeonbuk
|
44
|
22 (50%)
|
13 (30%)
|
9 (20%)
|
82 (1.86)
|
49 (1.11)
|
79 (60%)
|
1.79
|
Pohang
|
44
|
23 (52%)
|
8 (18%)
|
13 (30%)
|
72 (1.64)
|
47 (107)
|
77 (58%)
|
1.75
|
Suwon Samsung
|
44
|
20 (45%)
|
13 (30%)
|
11 (25%)
|
61 (1.38)
|
51 (1.16)
|
73 (55%)
|
1.66
|
Ulsan Hyundai
|
44
|
18 (41%)
|
14 (32%)
|
12 (27%)
|
60 (1.36)
|
52 (1.18)
|
68 (52%)
|
1.55
|
Jeju United
|
44
|
16 (36%)
|
15 (34%)
|
13 (30%)
|
71 (1.61)
|
56 (1.27)
|
63 (48%)
|
1.43
|
Busan I Park
|
44
|
13 (29.54%)
|
14 (31.81%)
|
17 (38.63%)
|
40 (0.91)
|
51 (1.16)
|
53 (40%)
|
1.2
|
Gyeongnam FC
|
44
|
14 (32%)
|
8 (18%)
|
22 (50%)
|
50 (1.14)
|
60 (1.36)
|
50 (38%)
|
1.14
|
Incheon United
|
44
|
17 (39%)
|
16 (36%)
|
11 (25%)
|
46 (1.05)
|
40 (0.91)
|
67 (51%)
|
1.52
|
Daegu FC
|
44
|
16 (36%)
|
13 (30%)
|
15 (34%)
|
55 (1.25)
|
56 (1.27)
|
61 (46%)
|
1.39
|
Jeonnam
|
44
|
13 (29.54%)
|
14 (31.81%)
|
17 (38.63%)
|
47 (107)
|
60 (1.36)
|
53 (40%)
|
1.2
|
Seongnam
|
44
|
14 (32%)
|
10 (23%)
|
20 (45%)
|
47 (107)
|
56 (1.27)
|
52 (39%)
|
1.18
|
Daejeon Citizen
|
44
|
13 (30%)
|
11 (25%)
|
20 (45%)
|
46 (1.05)
|
67 (1.52)
|
50 (38%)
|
1.14
|
Gangwon FC
|
44
|
14 (32%)
|
7 (16%)
|
23 (52%)
|
57 (1.30)
|
68 (1.55)
|
49 (37%)
|
1.11
|
Gwangju FC
|
44
|
10 (23%)
|
15 (34%)
|
19 (43%)
|
57 (1.30)
|
67 (1.52)
|
45 (34%)
|
1.02
|
Sangju Sangmu*
|
44
|
7 (N/A)
|
6 (N/A)
|
31 (N/A)
|
29 (N/A)
|
74 (N/A)
|
27 (N/A)
|
N/A
|
Seoul's title win that year was the best by any champion. That is why I would pick them as being the best team in the K-League for the last five years. I think would beat any other team, including Jeonbuk in 2014, if they played one another.
2013 K-League Classic Table
Team
|
P
|
Wins
|
Draws
|
Losses
|
GF (avg.)
|
GA (avg.)
|
Pts.
|
Avg Pts.
|
Pohang
|
38
|
21 (55%)
|
11 (29%)
|
6 (16%)
|
63 (1.66)
|
38 (1.0)
|
74 (65%)
|
1.95
|
Ulsan Hyundai
|
38
|
22 (58%)
|
7 (18%)
|
9 (24%)
|
63 (1.66)
|
37 (0.97)
|
73 (64%)
|
1.92
|
Jeonbuk
|
38
|
18 (47%)
|
9 (24%)
|
11 (29%)
|
61 (1.61)
|
49 (1.29)
|
63 (55%)
|
1.66
|
FC Seoul
|
38
|
17 (45%)
|
11 (29%)
|
10 (26%)
|
59 (1.55)
|
46 (1.21)
|
62 (54%)
|
1.63
|
Suwon Samsung
|
38
|
15 (39.47%)
|
8 (21.05%)
|
15 (39.47%)
|
50 (1.32)
|
43 (1.13)
|
53 (46%)
|
1.39
|
Busan I Park
|
38
|
14 (37%)
|
10 (26%)
|
14 (37%)
|
43 (1.13)
|
41 (1.08)
|
52 (46%)
|
1.37
|
Incheon United
|
38
|
12 (31.57%)
|
14 (36.84%)
|
12 (31.57%)
|
48 (1.26)
|
46 (1.21)
|
50 (44%)
|
1.31
|
Seongnam
|
38
|
17 (44.73%)
|
9 (23.68%)
|
12 (31.57%)
|
51 (1.34)
|
42 (1.11)
|
60 (53%)
|
1.58
|
Jeju United
|
38
|
16 (42%)
|
10 (26%)
|
12 (32%)
|
51 (1.34)
|
46 (1.21)
|
58 (51%)
|
1.53
|
Jeonnam
|
38
|
9 (24%)
|
13 (34%)
|
16 (42%)
|
34 (0.89)
|
45 (1.18)
|
40 (35%)
|
1.05
|
Gyeongnam
|
38
|
8 (21%)
|
13 (34%)
|
17 (45%)
|
42 (1.11)
|
55 (1.45)
|
37 (32%)
|
0.97
|
Gangwon FC
|
38
|
8 (21%)
|
12 (32%)
|
18 (47%)
|
37 (0.97)
|
64 (1.68)
|
36 (32%)
|
0.95
|
Daegu FC
|
38
|
6 (16%)
|
14 (37%)
|
18 (47%)
|
38 (1.0)
|
57 (1.5)
|
32 (28%)
|
0.84
|
Daejeon Citizen
|
38
|
7 (18%)
|
11 (29%)
|
20 (53%)
|
37 (0.97)
|
68 (1.79)
|
32 (28%)
|
0.84
|
I have written extensively on the race between Pohang and Ulsan and Seoul's terrible start. Therefore, I will write no more.
2014 K-League Classic Table
Team
|
P
|
Wins
|
Draws
|
Losses
|
GF (avg.)
|
GA (avg.)
|
Pts.
|
Avg Pts.
|
Jeonbuk
|
38
|
24 (63%)
|
9 (24%)
|
5 (13%)
|
60 (1.58)
|
22 (0.58)
|
81 (71%)
|
2.13
|
Suwon Samsung
|
38
|
19 (50%)
|
10 (26%)
|
9 (24%)
|
52 (1.37)
|
37 (0.97)
|
67 (59%)
|
1.76
|
FC Seoul
|
38
|
15 (39.47%)
|
13 (34.21%)
|
10 (26.31%)
|
42 (1.11)
|
28 (0.74)
|
58 (51%)
|
1.53
|
Pohang
|
38
|
16 (42%)
|
10 (26%)
|
12 (32%)
|
50 (1.32)
|
39 (1.03)
|
58 (51%)
|
1.53
|
Jeju United
|
38
|
14 (36.84%)
|
12 (31.57%)
|
12 (31.57%)
|
39 (1.03)
|
36 (0.95)
|
54 (47%)
|
1.42
|
Ulsan Hyundai
|
38
|
13 (34.21%)
|
11 (28.94%)
|
14 (36.84%)
|
44 (1.16)
|
43 (1.13)
|
50 (44%)
|
1.32
|
Jeonnam
|
38
|
14 (36.84%)
|
9 (23.68%)
|
15 (39.47%)
|
48 (1.26)
|
53 (1.39)
|
51 (45%)
|
1.34
|
Busan I Park
|
38
|
10 (26.31%)
|
13 (34.21%)
|
15 (39.47%)
|
37 (0.97)
|
49 (1.29)
|
43 (38%)
|
1.13
|
Seongnam
|
38
|
9 (24%)
|
13 (34%)
|
16 (42%)
|
32 (0.97)
|
39 (1.03)
|
40 (35%)
|
1.05
|
Incheon United
|
38
|
8 (21.05%)
|
16 (42.10%)
|
14 (36.84%)
|
33 (0.87)
|
46 (1.21)
|
40 (35%)
|
1.05
|
Gyeongnam FC
|
38
|
7 (18.42%)
|
15 (39.47%)
|
16 (42.10%)
|
30 (0.79)
|
52 (1.37)
|
36 (32%)
|
0.95
|
Sangju Sangmu
|
38
|
7 (18.42%)
|
13 (34.21%)
|
18 (47.36%)
|
39 (1.03)
|
62 (1.63)
|
34 (30%)
|
0.89
|
In my opinion, this is the most boring year in the last five years. Scoring was down and every team struggled to put the ball into the back of the net, hence the league average of 1.1 goals per game.
2015 K-League Classic Table
Team
|
P
|
Wins
|
Draws
|
Losses
|
GF (avg.)
|
GA (avg.)
|
Pts.
|
Avg Pts.
|
Jeonbuk
|
38
|
22 (58%)
|
7 (18%)
|
9 (24%)
|
57 (1.5)
|
39 (1.03)
|
73 (64%)
|
1.92
|
Suwon Samsung
|
38
|
19 (50%)
|
10 (26%)
|
9 (24%)
|
60 (1.58)
|
43 (1.13)
|
67 (59%)
|
1.76
|
Pohang
|
38
|
18 (47%)
|
12 (32%)
|
8 (21%)
|
49 (1.29)
|
32 (0.97)
|
66 (59%)
|
1.74
|
FC Seoul
|
38
|
17 (44.73%)
|
11 (28.94%)
|
10 (26.31%)
|
52 (1.37)
|
44 (1.16)
|
62 (54%)
|
1.63
|
Seongnam
|
38
|
15 (39.47%)
|
15 (39.47%)
|
8 (21.05%)
|
41 (1.08)
|
33 (0.87)
|
60 (53%)
|
1.58
|
Jeju United
|
38
|
14 (37%)
|
8 (21%)
|
16 (42%)
|
55 (1.45)
|
56 (1.47)
|
50 (44%)
|
1.32
|
Ulsan Hyundai
|
38
|
13 (34%)
|
14 (37%)
|
11 (29%)
|
54 (1.42)
|
45 (1.18)
|
53 (46%)
|
1.39
|
Incheon United
|
38
|
13 (34%)
|
12 (32%)
|
13 (34%)
|
35 (0.92)
|
32 (0.97)
|
51 (45%)
|
1.34
|
Jeonnam
|
38
|
12 (32%)
|
13 (34%)
|
13 (34%)
|
46 (1.21)
|
51 (1.34)
|
49 (43%)
|
1.29
|
Gwangju FC
|
38
|
10 (26%)
|
12 (32%)
|
16 (42%)
|
35 (0.92)
|
44 (1.16)
|
42 (37%)
|
1.11
|
Busan I Park
|
38
|
5 (13%)
|
11 (29%)
|
22 (58%)
|
30 (0.79)
|
55 (1.45)
|
26 (23%)
|
0.68
|
Daejeon Citzen
|
38
|
4 (11%)
|
7 (18%)
|
27 (71%)
|
32 (0.97)
|
72 (1.89)
|
19 (17%)
|
0.5
|
No comments:
Post a Comment